آیات عقائد ميں غلام احمد پرویز کے تفسیری اصول کا تنقیدی و تقابلی جائزہ

A Critical and Comparative Review of Ghulam Ahmed Pervez’s Interpretive Principal in Beliefs Verses

Abstract

    This article examines a critical and comparative study of Ayat-e-Aqeedah in Ghulam Ahmad Pervez's Tafseer Matalib-ul-Furqan. Allama Pervez's style is rational and scientific.  In the most verses of the Qur'an, he has used rational approach instead  of  narrative one. Consequently, there was a deviation from the accepted principle in Islamic Beliefs. Furthermore, Pervez Sahib has adopted his favorite commentary principles. This article mentions some of the arguments taken from his commentary which are contrary to the general interpretation of the verses of the beliefs, such as not acknowledging the authenticity of Hadith, denial of destiny (Taqdeer), scientific analysis of miracles, Heaven and Hell are metaphorical and the Ascension of the Prophet (PBUH) is seen as a dream. The conclusion is that the beliefs of Ghulam Ahmad Pervez Sahib are against the accepted beliefs of the majority of the Ummah.